<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The ramblings of a yorkshire tyke &#187; CLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/category/clr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog</link>
	<description>Life, Rants and Programming In A Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Getting started with Windows Azure</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/getting-started-with-windows-azure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/getting-started-with-windows-azure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Azure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/getting-started-with-windows-azure/" title="Getting started with Windows Azure"></a>As someone has been working with Windows Azure since its early days I understand how much effort it takes to get started with the platform. Luckily over the last couple of Windows Azure SDK releases the documentation is started to &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/getting-started-with-windows-azure/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/getting-started-with-windows-azure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A good new years gift&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/monodroid-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/monodroid-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MonoDroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monodroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/monodroid-beta/" title="A good new years gift..."></a>My day job keeps me housed in Visual Studio 2010/Windows, so for my out of hours development I feel I need a change, so for many years I have been a home mac and/or linux user; anyway I have used &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/monodroid-beta/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/monodroid-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael&#8217;s very own &#8220;Getting Started with Visual COBOL&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/burgun-getting-started-with-visual-cobol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/burgun-getting-started-with-visual-cobol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Visual Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VisualCOBOL2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getting started]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green screen development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual cobol 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual studio 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/burgun-getting-started-with-visual-cobol/" title="Michael&#039;s very own &quot;Getting Started with Visual COBOL&quot;"></a>Michael Burgun over at his own blog space has started blogging about using Visual COBOL&#8230; Its worth a look as having meet Michael last year I can honestly say he is a very knowledgeable and experienced chap, so I am &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/burgun-getting-started-with-visual-cobol/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2011/01/burgun-getting-started-with-visual-cobol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attachmate acquires Novell for $2.2 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/11/attachmate-acquires-novell-for-2-2-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/11/attachmate-acquires-novell-for-2-2-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attachmate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/11/attachmate-acquires-novell-for-2-2-billion/" title="Attachmate acquires Novell for $2.2 billion"></a>Over the last decade I have gained quite a lot of respect for Novell mainly due to their SUSE Linux platform and Mono. Strangely one of the companies involved in the acquisition is &#8220;Golden Gate&#8221; from San Fran, looks like &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/11/attachmate-acquires-novell-for-2-2-billion/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/11/attachmate-acquires-novell-for-2-2-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Java&#8230; does it have a future? Well not for me..</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/time-to-drop-java/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/time-to-drop-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/time-to-drop-java/" title="Java... does it have a future? Well not for me.."></a>As someone who has used Java for my own development needs for years, I find it sad the Java platform appears to be falling apart or at the very least getting some bad press. Lets consider the recent events, we &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/time-to-drop-java/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/time-to-drop-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQLCLR &#8211; Drop Assembly + Dependancies</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/tsql-sqlclr-drop-assembly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/tsql-sqlclr-drop-assembly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drop assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqlclr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/tsql-sqlclr-drop-assembly/" title="SQLCLR - Drop Assembly + Dependancies"></a>Recently I have had the pleasure of working on SQL Server 2008 R2 using the SQLCLR support. Which I must admit it is quite nice to use, though a couple of things have anoyed me while using&#8230; one of which &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/tsql-sqlclr-drop-assembly/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/10/tsql-sqlclr-drop-assembly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/08/dotnet-exceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/08/dotnet-exceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/08/dotnet-exceptions/" title=""></a>Last week I replied to a post about exceptions, it made me think those programming .Net daily take for granted the etiquette of using Exceptions. So I thought I would share some of my thoughts&#8230; well it is a sort &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/08/dotnet-exceptions/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/08/dotnet-exceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extending Visual COBOL 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/07/extending-visual-cobol-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/07/extending-visual-cobol-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VisualCOBOL2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spell Checker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/07/extending-visual-cobol-2010/" title="Extending Visual COBOL 2010"></a>One of the many great reasons for choosing Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 as our development platform for Visual COBOL 2010 is it ability to be extended&#8230; which we have done but you equally use third party extensions too. One of &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/07/extending-visual-cobol-2010/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/07/extending-visual-cobol-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Method Chaining</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/05/method-chaining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/05/method-chaining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobol.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method-chaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualcobol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/05/method-chaining/" title="Method Chaining"></a>Creating objects with a complex constructor can be a bit of a pain in any language. One technique I have used is method chaining. It is not applicable to every type of class but it can be useful. Method chain &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/05/method-chaining/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/05/method-chaining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflection and COBOL</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/02/cobol-dotnet-reflection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/02/cobol-dotnet-reflection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobol.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managed cobol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/02/cobol-dotnet-reflection/" title="Reflection and COBOL"></a>For the last couple of months I have working on Visual Studio 2010 and this include Microsoft CLR v4 and I was recently asked how to write a test that determines at runtime which CLR is being used and what &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/02/cobol-dotnet-reflection/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/02/cobol-dotnet-reflection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Application Architecture Guide, 2nd Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/01/microsoft-application-architecture-guide-2nd-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/01/microsoft-application-architecture-guide-2nd-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Application Architecture Guide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/01/microsoft-application-architecture-guide-2nd-edition/" title="Microsoft Application Architecture Guide, 2nd Edition"></a>Microsoft have just updated the &#8220;Application Architecture&#8221;.  I can&#8217;t say I have read it from cover to cover but it is being downloaded to my ebook reader&#8230; Microsoft Application Architecture Guide, 2nd Edition The guide helps you to: Understand the &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/01/microsoft-application-architecture-guide-2nd-edition/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2010/01/microsoft-application-architecture-guide-2nd-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Comparison Of .Net COBOL, Visual Basic and C#</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/cobol-vb-csharp-compared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/cobol-vb-csharp-compared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VB.Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobol.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/cobol-vb-csharp-compared/" title="A Comparison Of .Net COBOL, Visual Basic and C#"></a>Today my collegues Robert and Alex have finally decided to publish a document that compares Visual Basic, C# and COBOL for .Net under The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. Rather than doing a cut-paste job, here is a quote from &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/cobol-vb-csharp-compared/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/cobol-vb-csharp-compared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Factory Method Pattern in COBOL</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/factory-method-pattern-in-cobol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/factory-method-pattern-in-cobol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobol.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factorypattern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/factory-method-pattern-in-cobol/" title="Factory Method Pattern in COBOL"></a>Continuing my series on design patterns for the COBOL, the next one on my list is the &#8220;Factory method&#8221; pattern. The pattern is useful, as it helps you hide the real implementation/creation mechanism of your classes. I you are fond &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/factory-method-pattern-in-cobol/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/12/factory-method-pattern-in-cobol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design Patterns and COBOL</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/design-patterns-and-cobol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/design-patterns-and-cobol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DesignPatterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singleton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/design-patterns-and-cobol/" title="Design Patterns and COBOL"></a>As part of my working life I happy to say I use COBOL and for better or worse it is here to stay. With this in mind it annoys me I here/see saying things such as COBOL is a old &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/design-patterns-and-cobol/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/design-patterns-and-cobol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Type Safety and COBOL</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/type-safety-and-cobol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/type-safety-and-cobol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TypeSafety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/type-safety-and-cobol/" title="Type Safety and COBOL"></a>Having read a recent bog about COBOL and type-safety, I though I would jot down some comments. ANS85 COBOL is naturally is type-unsafe due as every data item being part of one memory region (or storage area), because of this &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/type-safety-and-cobol/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/type-safety-and-cobol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Base Class Library, Arrays, Queues and Stacks</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/base-class-library-arrays-queues-and-stacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/base-class-library-arrays-queues-and-stacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BaseCL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/base-class-library-arrays-queues-and-stacks/" title="Base Class Library, Arrays, Queues and Stacks"></a>Continuing the series of blogs about COBOL and the .Net base class library&#8230; The .Net base class library has a wealth classes and an huge of amount of methods/properties. The .Net base class library has a key handy namespace that &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/base-class-library-arrays-queues-and-stacks/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/base-class-library-arrays-queues-and-stacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detecting the use Mono CLR dynamically</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/detecting-the-use-mono-clr-dynamically/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/detecting-the-use-mono-clr-dynamically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/detecting-the-use-mono-clr-dynamically/" title="Detecting the use Mono CLR dynamically"></a>While developing something that could be used on Mono on Windows, Mono on Unix and on Windows with Microsoft&#8217;s CLR, I needed to be sensitive to the environment but didn&#8217;t want to conditionally compile my code different. So I put &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/detecting-the-use-mono-clr-dynamically/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/detecting-the-use-mono-clr-dynamically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arrays and the .Net Base Cass Library</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/arrays-and-the-net-base-cass-library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/arrays-and-the-net-base-cass-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/arrays-and-the-net-base-cass-library/" title="Arrays and the .Net Base Cass Library"></a>Carrying on from the previous blog, the user of iterators in .Net and especially .Net on COBOL can be very useful. When CLR v2.0 was introduced a few new methods in System.IO.File for block reading/writing files were introduced, these works &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/arrays-and-the-net-base-cass-library/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/arrays-and-the-net-base-cass-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Iterate or not&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/too-iterate-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/too-iterate-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BaseCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iterators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/too-iterate-or-not/" title="Too Iterate or not..."></a>Over the next couple of weeks, I will explore some of the reasons why I think managed environments are good for COBOL. So.. lets the show on the road&#8230; Setting up arrays/occurs items in COBOL and manipulating them can be &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/too-iterate-or-not/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/too-iterate-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NUnit and COBOL.Net</title>
		<link>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/nunit-and-cobol-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/nunit-and-cobol-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spgennard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[COBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUnit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gennard.net/blog/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/nunit-and-cobol-net/" title="NUnit and COBOL.Net"></a>A while back, I spent a afternoon converting some C# NUnit documentation into COBOL .Net, so I thought I would share the document with the world, with the hope that it will help any one interested in using NUnit and &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/nunit-and-cobol-net/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gennard.net/blog/2009/11/nunit-and-cobol-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

